Human Logic	Quantum Probabilities	Hidden Variable	Cyber Experiment	Page in view

Human-Logic and Quantum-Probabilities Conciliation

Take your pencil and dip part of it into a large bowl of water as shown in the pictures.




When the pencil is vertical (that is 90⁰), as shown on the left, it looks straight. When the pencil is set at an angle, as shown on the right, its image below the surface of the water appears bent out of shape.




It turns out that no bending or no tilting (no deflection, or no diffraction in science) is occurring when the pencil angular orientation is set at 90⁰ or 180⁰ or 270⁰ or 360⁰. And, in each of the 0⁰-to-90⁰, 90⁰-to-180⁰, 180⁰-to-270⁰ and 270⁰-to-360⁰ quadrants, the deflections are occurring in symmetrical manners as shown on the right picture, resulting in the 4 quarters Quantum statistical distribution and as also described in gravimotion's detailed interpretation.

Yet You and I know that when immersed at an angle the pencil's body is not bent as it appears to be. The pencil remains straight, a state coinciding to Plain Logic, and its image the latter as described through quantum's probabilities equation 1 (as well as through gravimotion's explicit equation 2), both actual state and appearance remaining in force. This conciliates these two seemingly incompatible states. Observation of reality and reality are two different aspects of the same reality, even though these two realities appear to be contradicting each other.

Interesting note: Electrons that have mass are very likely behaving as the pencil does; while their image is appearing deflected, they are very likely going straight through the air to the water surface.
On the other hand photons, which have no mass, are very likely fully deflected, with no material body going in a straight line unseen. In gravimotion interpretation of Nature a photon, rather than being assimilated to a particle, is occurring as a wave and more specifically as a single wavelength of its scientific assigned frequency.

The 2 conflicting sides of the scientific discord have no raison d'être (no purpose).
In the end while appreciating Quantum Probabilities both uncertainty and nonlocality concepts may be discarded.

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Introduced in 1927 by Werner Heisenberg, the uncertainty principle states that the more precisely the motion of any particle is determined, the less precisely its position can be predicted.
Yet in science physics the Universe is expanding, in other words everything is in motion.

Merging above 2 scientific assertions into a single proposition, because everything is in motion, gravimotion interpretation of Nature states that the concept of position cannot be predicted or measured; in gravimotion, positions do not occur; our human concept of position has no physical collateral; only motion is real or measurable.
No matter the accuracy of the measures, motion is a physical certainty.

On how uncertainty nevertheless remains ...

While we know with certainty that life on Earth has a finite time span, meaning that we know with certainty that we will die, we humans are nevertheless not given the ability to precisely predict all aspects of our own future. In spite of the Natural Laws, that among other rule with certainty over entangled pairs, our human brain can only be uncertain about many other things.

© 2020 Henri Salles. You are welcome to share above simply mention the link: https://EPR-substantiation.info. Contact henriJMsalles[at]gmail.com.