Human Logic	Quantum Probabilities	Page in view	Cyber Experiment	Conciliation

Hidden Variable

BEWARE, at time of this writing, the following language and equation is denied by most professional physicists; yet this gravimotion entanglement interpretation while concurring with science's mathematics is only challenging science's psychological interpretation of it.
Should mathematics not be your bag, simply ignore Equation 2 and jump to the paragraph printed in green color below.
Equation 2 below, while concurring with Quantum probabilities Equation 1, brings to light the individual behavior of each particle, as predicted by EPR yet banished by Bell's theorem.
Provided the pairs are evenly distributed when emitted, those tilted between 1⁰ and 135⁰ represent three quarters of those tilted between 1⁰ and 180⁰. The remaining 45 pairs between 135⁰ and 180⁰ make the remaining quarter. And due to symmetry an identical distribution applies to the other 181⁰ to 360⁰ half of the spectrum.
In order to match the physical measures and Quantum Mechanics statistics when the detectors are set 120⁰ apart, it suffices to come up with an equation that modifies the pairs tilted between 0⁰ and 135⁰ to angles tilted between 0⁰ and 120⁰. Equation 2 is just doing that:

When the detectors are oriented 120⁰ apart as in Figures 2 and 3, the particles evenly tilted from 0⁰ to 135⁰ when emitted will be, according to Equation 2, deflected and measured between 0⁰ and 120⁰ by both Detectors; these explicit deflections precisely coincide with the physical measures and Quantum mechanics statistics.
This explicit interpretation is written in green because it is in agreement with both experiments and Quantum Mechanics probabilities.

In this interpretation the 2 particles of any pair are acting in concert with Quantum probabilities, not because one side is instructing the other to comply instantly over distance, but because at the very time the measures take place, each and all electron tilts are individually and precisely deflected in the amount provided by Equation 2.

Quantum Mechanics Equation 1 Hidden Aspect / Detector Effective Behavior

Gravimotion's Cyber Experiment shows that both left and right detectors are each behaving independently of each other in accordance to universal rules; and that occurs no matter the reference chosen by us human beings for our human interpretation; as such any reference other than the trajectory, as introduced in preceding Human Logic page, may be chosen.
Let us choose the Θ_RD right Detector angular orientation for reference; Θ_RD being now null:

Equation 3, a derivative of Equation 1 hidden aspect shows that detectors' orientations just as electrons' tilts can be re-oriented in order to describe the entanglement phenomenon.

Equation 3 modifies θ_{DetectorNominalOrientation} = 120⁰ into θ_{DetectorEffectiveOrientation} = 135⁰ and θ_{DetectorNominalOrientation} = 0⁰ remains unchanged at θ_{DetectorEffectiveOrientation} = 0⁰.
In these conditions one quarter identical measures instead of one third identical measures will occur, provided the emitted electrons are evenly distributed over the full 360⁰ circumference.

Quantum Mechanics Equation 1 is dealing with the detectors angular difference, in effect that difference is entwining the 2 detectors angular orientations in one entity, unconditionally mandating instantaneous interaction altogether abrogating distance.
In gravimotion's interpretation of Nature, the 2 detectors are instead located far away from each other, are independently set and are independently measuring the entangled particles.
All in all the 2 detectors' physical distant separation is incompatible with Quantum Mechanics inextricably entwined angular difference.
In short Equation 1 inconsiderate use of the detectors angular difference is at the origin of the conflict.
Let's face it, such angular difference is not a physical entity, it actually is occurring as 2 specific orientations of 2 specific detectors far apart from each other; and that can no longer justify uncertainty and non locality.
Nevertheless Quantum Mechanics Equation 1 probabilities mend nicely with local reality.

Tacit entanglement

The two detectors MIRROR IMAGES of each other, because SET 120 DEGREES APART, are behaving in concert as if they were physically connected. Note that this tacit behavior interpretation turns out to be complying with Quantum Mechanics non-locality.
Yet the pairs' two particles COMPLEMENTARY state is also acting tacitly on each side of the emitter over distance just as if the 2 particles were connected through a physical rod playing the role of instantaneous communication between the two.
These just mentioned 2 behaviors are now individually acting in concert with each other, on each side of the pairs' emitter, no matter the distance. This distant tacit collaboration is now justifying EPR's hidden variable.

When the detectors are set 120 degrees apart, Quantum Mechanics stipulates that only an infinite number of pairs emitted will provide the 25% 75% distribution. The Cyber Experiment proposed here reveals that 3 essential factors are actually at play:

1. The number of pairs must be a whole of 8.
2. The particles' angular orientation must be evenly distributed over the entire 360 degrees spectrum; as such the number of pairs to be emitted can be 8, or 16, or 24, or 32 up to an infinite number, the latter only being considered in Quantum Mechanics theory and experiments.
   Should one choose to emit 24 pairs, the pairs should be separated 15 degrees from each other; such details, even though essential, are totally ignored in Quantum Mechanics.
3. And as mentioned above the pairs' complementary aspect is of the essence.
   The computer simulation labeled Cyber Experiment reveals that this complementary factor may be interpreted either as the 2 particles of any pair being emitted at 180 degrees from each other or the two particles being emitted with identical orientation.
   When complementary pairs are emitted 3 quarters flash the same colors 1 quarter differing colors. When twins are emitted 1 quarter flash identical colors 3 quarters flash differing colors.
   All pairs' configurations that are neither complementary nor twin fail to provide the 1 to 3 quarters distribution.

Yet all of the above is not what creates the 25%, 75% distribution; such specific distribution is entirely dependent on the deflection of the particles. Or besides all of the above, which is mandatory, the particles' deflections (called diffraction in science) are the cause behind the observed phenomenon.
In addition the Cyber Experiment proposed in this application disclosed another result usually not mentioned in science; the 25% 75% distribution is also occurring when the detectors' orientations differ by 60 degrees, 240 degrees and 300 degrees.

Mother Nature's precision, beauty-fullness, and let's face it sly behavior regarding these entangled pairs is flabbergasting ... Her Magnificence had to be uncovered ...

© 2020 Henri Salles. You are welcome to share above simply mention the link: https://EPR-substantiation.info. Contact henriJMsalles[at]gmail.com.